26, 2001) (finding bad faith where a competitor of the complainant registered and used a domain name confusingly similar to the complainant’s PENTHOUSE mark to host a pornographic web site); , FA 198805 (Nat. It is a reasonable inference that Respondent's purpose of registration and use was to either disrupt or create confusion for Complainant's business in bad faith pursuant to Policy ¶¶4(b)(iii) [and] (iv).”). 10, 2003) (“As Respondent is using the domain name at issue in direct competition with Complainant, and giving the impression of being affiliated with or sponsored by Complainant, this circumstance qualifies as bad faith registration and use of the domain name pursuant to Policy ¶4(b)(iv).”); Clelland, FA 198018 (Nat. 11, 2003) (“Respondent registered a domain name confusingly similar to Complainant's mark to divert Internet users to a competitor's website. It was owned by several entities, from limited Dating Limited to Dating Limited, it was hosted by Ilius France.Datingdirectaffinity has a decent Google pagerank and bad results in terms of Yandex topical citation index.MEETIC resides in France and their email is [email protected], Dating Direct owners included Datingdirect. Com Limited in 2012 as well as limited Datingdirect. The current uk owner and other personalities/entities that used to own this domain in the past are listed below.Such activity by the Respondent presupposes that the Complainant’s business was known and identified by its name. 23, 2001) (finding confusing similarity where the domain name in dispute contains the identical mark of the Complainant combined with a generic word or term); see also Sony Kabushiki Kaisha v. 9, 2000) (finding that “[n]either the addition of an ordinary descriptive word . The Complainant asserts that, for the reasons stated below, it has made a prima facie case that the Respondent should be considered as having no rights or legitimate interests in the Domain and that the burden now shifts to the Respondent. The Respondent did not deny any of the claims made by the Complainant, and in particular the Respondent did not deny that it was aware of the Complainant and its business when it registered the Domain. 29, 2000) (“In the absence of a response, it is appropriate to accept as true all allegations of the Complaint.”). COM, given extensive use of that mark to identify the complainant as the source of broadcast services over the Internet, and evidence there is wide recognition with the BROADCASTAMERICA. mark, it also had common law rights in the BIBBERO mark because it had developed brand name recognition with the word “bibbero”). The Domain entirely incorporates Complainant’s mark with the addition of either the descriptive word “sex”. Indeed it would not have been credible if the Respondent, a UK based operator of a dating website, had denied knowledge of the Complainant given that the Complainant is a major player – if not the market leader -(ii.) 4b(iv): By using the domain name, Respondent has intentionally attempted to attract, for commercial gain, Internet users to Respondent’s web site or other on-line location, by creating a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant’s mark as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or endorsement of Respondent’s web site or location or of a product or service on Respondent’s web site or location. Forum July 31, 2000) (holding that the respondent’s failure to respond allows all reasonable inferences of fact in the allegations of the complaint to be deemed true); see also Talk City, Inc. Complainant has asserted that it has spent almost £10 million on marketing, advertised in national magazines, newspapers, specialty magazines, on television, national and local radio, posters, leaflets in health clubs, and on billboards, and spent considerable money to establish high priority on search engines. COM mark among Internet users as to the source of broadcast services); Bibbero Sys., Inc.
Sign-up for free here Dating is a fun and sociable place to meet new people. Dating members are real British men and women with great life experiences to share.
has verified that Respondent is bound by the Tucows Inc.
registration agreement and has thereby agreed to resolve domain-name disputes brought by third parties in accordance with ICANN's Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Policy"). 23, 2002) (where complainant has asserted that respondent has no rights or legitimate interests it was incumbent on respondent to come forward with concrete evidence rebutting this assertion because this information is “uniquely within the knowledge and control of the respondent”). 11, 2000) (finding that “[I]t would be unconscionable to find a bona fide offering of services in a respondent’s operation of web-site using a domain name which is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s mark and for the same business”). The Respondent’s website does offer online dating services.(iii.) Whether Respondent is making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the domain name, without intent for commercial gain to misleadingly divert consumers or to tarnish the trademark or service mark at issue.
According to My Wot, Siteadvisor and Google safe browsing analytics, Affiliation.is a suspicious domain with no visitor reviews.
Dating is the premier dating and chat site in Europe. Have great dates by talking directly via chat Keywords: edate, dates, tchatche, gay, friendship, tchat, chatroom, tchatched, tchatcher, tchate, dating ads, direct talks, dating sites, love, single, singles, free chat, small dating ads, dialog, free dating, dating club, meet women, meet gays, chat dating, gay chat, ...